These are opinionated write-ups based on years of watching how these networks actually treat publishers — what they pay, what they hide in the fine print, who they're built for. No affiliate links. No "comp'd" accounts. No PR pitches.
Coinzilla review: crypto advertising's default network — European, regulated, deep marketplace, fair terms; opaque publisher requirements the one flaw. 9/10.
The default choice in crypto advertising — quietly displacing older rivals.
Premium crypto inventory and the friendliest payouts in the niche — behind a €3,000 door.
The 2011 original — still anonymous, still cookie-less, still paying in BTC every day.
Ads where the wallets already are — the most engineering-dense young network in the niche.
The Web3 ad veteran with deep targeting — and a thinning footprint on premium crypto media.
Native ads with a $10 door — and a reputation its owner writes for it.
The most Web3-native targeting in the niche — behind a $5,000 door and a $5 liability cap.
A real self-serve Web3 & iGaming platform that won’t tell you the price until you’re inside.
The strongest parent in the niche, running its crypto brand on autopilot.
The biggest claims in crypto advertising — behind a $10,000 door and a 2.7-star record.
Marquee placements and traffic stats that no one — including arithmetic — will vouch for.
Real software wrapped in numbers that refute each other
Push, pop and Telegram Mini App marketing site with model paperwork and no platform we could verify
Open-source ad blockchain whose campaign button has returned a server error since August and whose ad servers are closed to new accounts
| Network | Rating | RPM (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| Coinzilla | 9.0 | $3–7 |
| Cointraffic | 7.5 | — |
| A-ADS | 7.0 | — |
| HypeLab | 7.0 | — |
| Bitmedia | 6.5 | — |
| Mintfunnel | 5.5 | — |
| Slise | 5.5 | — |
| DOT Ads | 5.0 | — |
| Coin.Network | 5.0 | — |
| Blockchain-Ads | 4.5 | — |
| CoinAdMedia | 4.5 | — |
| AdsNetwork | 4.0 | — |
| TrafficSigma | 3.5 | — |
| Adshares | 3.0 | — |
