Slise vs Coinzilla: $5,000 in the contract and a $5 liability cap against €100 and a sign-up form, and what Slise’s own blog gets wrong about Coinzilla

Slise and Coinzilla sell two different rooms of the same house. Slise puts a leaderboard inside the application, on the explorer, the DeFi front end or the NFT analytics tool where a wallet is already connected, and it sells that placement through a contact form, an agreement and an invoice. Coinzilla puts banners on the pages people read about crypto, CoinGecko, Etherscan, DEXTools and a few hundred more, and sells them through a sign-up form, an identity check and a €100 deposit. Slise’s own blog argues that the second room is a waste of money; Coinzilla’s own pages argue nothing about Slise at all. We read both sets of documents again on 2 November 2026, the terms, the FAQs, the format pages, the one Trustpilot profile that exists, and the Slise blog post that names Coinzilla, and set them side by side. We have no commercial relationship with either network.

The short answer

For almost every advertiser the first conversation is Coinzilla, and the reason is not the inventory, it is the paperwork. You can open the account, pass the identity check, deposit €100, set a bid and have a campaign reviewed within a business day without talking to a salesperson, and if it does not work you have lost €100 under an Irish contract that caps the company’s exposure at what you paid. Slise asks you to agree a price by email, sign a document that says $5,000 when the website says $500, pay an invoice and trust a Seychelles company whose liability to you is capped at five dollars. That is not a reason to avoid Slise; it is a reason to make the first campaign small enough that the contract never matters.

Slise is the right call in one case, and it is a real one: your product lives inside the wallet session. A DeFi protocol, a bridge, an infrastructure API, a hardware wallet, anything whose buyer is already transacting on-chain, is better reached on the explorer and the dashboard than on the news page, and Slise is one of two networks that sell that placement with wallet-level targeting attached. Its own case studies, QuickNode at a 0.46% click-through rate and $1.30 a click, COINSBEE at 0.58% and $1.15, are vendor figures, but they describe a product Coinzilla does not have. Coinzilla, 9/10 in our review, has the broader door and the cleaner contract. Slise, 5.5/10, has the sharper tool and the harsher paper. The rest of this page is the evidence.

What each network actually sells

Coinzilla is a display network for crypto and finance media. Its publisher page, read on 2 November, scrolls a list that includes coingecko.com, etherscan.io, dextools.io, dexscreener.com, blockchain.com, solscan.io, bscscan.com, beincrypto.com and cryptopotato.com; its homepage counts “1B+” impressions and “1.8M+” clicks a month and “50,000+ CAMPAIGNS DELIVERED”, and claims it is “Chosen by over 80% of crypto advertisers”, a figure with no method behind it anywhere on the site. The product is a bid: you pick websites and ad zones, countries, regions and devices, set a price per thousand impressions, and compete with every other bid on that inventory; Coinzilla’s own first-campaign guide puts it plainly, a higher CPM gives you “a greater chance of winning the bid”. Beside the display engine sits a marketplace of fixed-price placements, press releases, sponsored articles, newsletter slots, and a retargeting pixel whose page promises conversion rates “up to 70%” higher than cold ads, a number the page does not source.

Slise is a banner network for applications. Its launch-offer page, unchanged since we first read it in September, describes “banner ads in our network of dApps that include advanced DeFi protocols, NFT analytics tools, blockchain explorers, and Web3 gaming platforms”, and sells the audience as the “Top 2% crypto-traffic you can find”: people with a wallet connected at the moment the ad loads. Targeting is where the two part company. Slise offers “wallet-specific Web3-personas, chains, and wallet activity” on top of location and device; Coinzilla’s advertiser FAQ says “you can target your audience based on country or device” and its Web3 advertising page adds websites, ad zones and regions. Neither can see the other’s audience. Coinzilla does not know what is in the reader’s wallet, and Slise does not reach the reader at all. Our wallet-targeting explainer covers what that on-chain signal can and cannot tell an advertiser before you pay a premium for it.

Two facts of ownership belong here. Slise’s homepage now introduces “maads — the Web3 marketing arm of our ecosystem”, and MAADS’s own site lists Slise beside AADS as its two growth tools, so Slise shares a group with A-ADS, the anonymous $100 self-serve network, and with an agency that resells both. Coinzilla is a product of Sevio Digital Limited, company 729804, Dublin, and every page of its site says so. Neither relationship is hidden; both tell you who is on the other end of the invoice.

Getting in: €100 and a sign-up form, or $500 on the FAQ and $5,000 in the contract

Coinzilla’s door has a price written in two places that agree. The terms, version 1.1 of 10 July 2023 and still the document in force, say that “Advertisers have to pay to the Company, in advance, a minimum amount of EUR 100”, spendable on any campaign type. The homepage FAQ repeats “EUR 100, but we have a minimum daily budget of EUR 50 per campaign”, so the minimum buys two days of one campaign at the floor; our minimum daily budgets comparison runs that arithmetic for every network. Deposits arrive by bank transfer, by card since a 2025 announcement on Coinzilla’s blog, or in crypto through the two processors the terms name, SpectroCoin and CoinGate; every balance is held in euro, and “All the exchanges fees will be supported by the User, which will be retained from the amounts initially paid in advance”. The terms want the money “in a single full transaction” and treat a string of micro-payments as grounds for suspension. Before any of it, identity: Coinzilla runs individuals through iDenfy and asks companies for incorporation documents, which is why it heads our KYC comparison. Approval of a campaign takes “within 1 business day” per the FAQ, up to 48 hours at weekends, where the terms allow 24 hours on working days and up to 72 at weekends and holidays.

Slise’s door has a price written in two places that disagree. The launch-offer FAQ answers “What is the minimal starting budget?” with “Our minimum starting budget is $500”, and sets out the route: “reach out to us and tell us about your requirements. After that we’ll send you an agreement and an invoice”. The terms of service, effective 28 November 2025, say under clause 4.2 “Prepayment is required; minimum campaign budget: $5,000.” The FAQ said $5k itself as late as June 2026, as our review recorded, and the terms have not moved since the FAQ did. There is no sign-up page: /advertisers, /publishers, /pricing and /about all return not-found pages, the dashboard at app.slise.xyz shows two words, “Not authorized”, and every button on the site reads “Contact us”. The FAQ says “Yes, we have a self-serving dashboard where you can manage campaigns, view real-time analytics, run A/B tests, and track conversions”, which is a description of what you get after onboarding, not a way to start. Payment is by “bank transfers, major cryptocurrencies (USDT, USDC, ETH, BTC)”. No identity check is mentioned at signup; the terms ask for a government ID only when a suspended account wants back in.

The practical difference is who holds the pen. At Coinzilla the price is the terms, the same for everyone, and the bid is yours. At Slise the price is whatever the agreement says, and the public documents give two figures an order of magnitude apart. Whatever a Slise account manager quotes you, get it into the agreement, because clause 4.2 is what the terms will fall back on.

What the contracts do with money you do not spend

Both keep it, and the differences are in the exceptions and the clocks. Coinzilla’s refund clause is one sentence in capitals: “ALL AMOUNTS PAID BY ADVERTISING AGENTS AND REFLECTED IN USERS’ ACCOUNTS ARE NON-REFUNDABLE.” The exception sits in the termination section: if Coinzilla ends the agreement on 24 hours’ notice “for reasons not attributable to the User”, the advertiser is entitled to “a refund of all the amounts paid in advance and not used”. The clock is a year: an account inactive for one year “will be permanently deleted, with no way of retrieving it or the paid and unused amounts”, after emails at seven days, 48 hours and 24 hours before the deadline. One more clause is worth reading twice. Balances on both sides of the platform have “a notional value, calculated and administered at our discretion”, and the company may limit access to them while it runs additional checks. Coinzilla replied to a 2024 Trustpilot reviewer asking for a €450 balance back by pointing at exactly this policy. Our refund policies comparison ranks it among the strict but predictable sets of paper: no refund, said plainly, with the exception written down.

Slise’s terms say the same thing twice and then go further. Clause 4.2: “All payments are non-refundable unless agreed otherwise.” Section 9: “All payments by Advertisers are considered final and non-refundable” and “Refunds may only be issued if the Platform initiates termination of services”, which clause 4.3 allows “with 24 hours’ notice”. The clock is half Coinzilla’s: “Accounts inactive for 6 months may be deactivated and residual funds forfeited unless an extension is granted.” Then the sentence that reframes every other number on this page, in section 13: “Maximum liability of the Company is limited to five USD ($5.00).” Coinzilla’s equivalent clause limits its liability, outside intent or gross negligence, to foreseeable damages “not exceeding the amount of fees paid by the User for the relevant Services”, which on a €100 account is €100 and on a €50,000 account is €50,000. Slise’s is five dollars on a contract whose own floor is five thousand. The forum follows the same pattern: Coinzilla’s disputes go to the Irish courts under Irish law; Slise’s go to arbitration under HKIAC rules under Hong Kong law, against a company registered in the Seychelles whose privacy policy still names a different entity, “Slise Inc.”, as the data controller. Our terms red-flags guide was written with clauses like the second set in mind.

Formats, targeting and the price per thousand

Coinzilla’s format page lists classic banners in six sizes, “300×250 | 728×90 | 160×600 | 320×100 | 300×600 | 320×50”, with HTML5 accepted, plus native units that copy the publisher’s design, header banners, sticky banners and pop-unders, the last of which the same page says is “mostly used by Single Opt-In offers”. The page quotes its own click-through rates: an “Average CTR of 0.15%” for classic banners, “from 0.20% to 0.40%” for headers, “between 0.20% and 0.30%” for sticky units. Pricing is a bid per thousand impressions with no rate card; the advertiser FAQ brackets the market at “a CPM of €0.2” for brand-awareness traffic and “€3” for the premium package, and, as our review noted, the campaign builder shows the recommended or highest current CPM for your targeting before you commit. Our CPM and CPC rates comparison puts those brackets beside every other network’s published figures.

Slise’s menu is two lines long on purpose: “728 x 90 – Leaderboard” and “270 x 90 – Mobile Banner”, “both static (jpg) and animated (gif)”, no HTML5, no native, no video, sold on CPM only; the FAQ says “Currently we operate on a CPM basis” and declines CPA. The launch offer prices the inventory at “discounted CPM rates under $10”, with “no service fee”, against “the typical $30-40 that other Web3 platforms charge”, and claims a click-through rate “of 0.3-0.4%” against an “industry average of 0.1%”. The COINSBEE case study names “Slise’s competitive CPM of $6-7”. Set the two sets of vendor numbers together and the shape is clear: Coinzilla’s premium bracket at €3 is roughly half Slise’s quoted floor, Slise’s claimed click-through rate is two to three times Coinzilla’s classic-banner figure, and both are the sellers’ own measurements. Slise also publishes its top ten geographies, led by the United States, Nigeria and the United Kingdom and including Russia at number eight, which Coinzilla’s terms exclude outright along with Belarus, Iran, Syria, Cuba and North Korea; an advertiser with a compliance team will want to ask Slise about that list before the first invoice.

The publisher side

Coinzilla has a publisher door and publishes most of what is behind it. Sites must be “cryptocurrency-related websites and projects” per the publisher FAQ, and the terms reserve the right to accept “only cryptocurrency and finance-related websites”; approval is manual, no more than three banners may show at once, header and sticky units included, a rejected site may ask for a second review only after a week, and the one number that is not published is the traffic threshold. An 18 October 2026 Trustpilot review puts it at a “requirement of 5k visitors per month” proved through Google Analytics, and Coinzilla’s January 2026 reply to another rejected publisher confirmed “a minimum traffic requirement” without stating it. Earnings are CPM, the threshold is “€50”, payouts run automatically weekly or monthly and are “generally processed within 1-2 business days, but can take up to a week”. The publisher page still advertises withdrawals “with no costs via BTC, ETH, USDT (ERC20), or Bank Wire (SEPA/SWIFT)”, but a 26 February 2025 blog post says “USDT payments are no longer available with our payment processors” and asks publishers to switch to USDC or a bank account, and the terms say conversion and bank fees are deducted from what you are owed. Read the blog and the terms, not the marketing line. Our publisher-side ranking keeps Coinzilla at the top for exactly these reasons.

Slise has no publisher door. The address /publishers returned a not-found page from Europe and from the United States on 2 November, the FAQ offers the publisher list only “upon request”, and dApps join by invitation or by writing in. What they sign is the strictest publisher paper we have read this year. Clause 3.2: “Payments are made in USDT (Ethereum ERC20), within 15 days after month-end” and “Minimum payout threshold applies; unpaid amounts roll over”, without saying what the threshold is. Placements must keep “at least 95% uptime”, domains must be registered “for at least three (3) months”, publishers accept a twelve-month ban on dealing directly with advertisers they met through the platform, backed by “legal claims including liquidated damages”, and section 7 lets Slise demand “Google Analytics data” during an audit. Section 8 prices the way back after a suspension at “an administrative restoration fee equal to 10% of unpaid earnings or $1,000 USD, whichever is lower”. One network publishes a floor, a schedule and a fee of zero of its own; the other publishes a penalty. Our publisher requirements comparison sets both against the rest of the market.

What Slise’s own blog says about Coinzilla, checked against Coinzilla’s pages

Slise’s homepage links three posts on a Substack at blog.slise.xyz, and one of them is about this comparison. “The Red Pill for Crypto Marketers: 5 Hard Truths About User Acquisition Beyond Coinzilla”, signed Oleksii Sidorov and dated 10 July 2023, though its closing paragraph begins “In 2025, the crypto market is more competitive than ever”, so it has been revised since. We treat it the way we treat every network’s page about a rival, line by line against the rival’s own documents, as we did for HypeLab’s page about Coinzilla.

Three of its claims hold. Coinzilla is “one of the largest Web2-focused crypto ad networks”; it does boast “over a billion monthly impressions”, the homepage says “1B+”; and its publishers do include “price trackers like CoinGecko”, which is on the publisher page. The thesis also holds as far as it goes: a reader of a crypto news site is not necessarily a wallet holder, and Slise’s inventory filters for one. The arithmetic attached to it does not. The post says that “without specific targeting (which Coinzilla do not provide) 98% of the advertising budget will go directly to waste”, derived from a news site with “100 million monthly visits” against “a few million” daily active wallets. Coinzilla does provide targeting, by website, ad zone, country, region and device, and a retargeting pixel; what it does not provide is wallet-level targeting, which is a narrower and fairer statement. And the 98% is a ratio of two unrelated counts, one site’s visits against the whole chain’s daily wallets, not a measurement of anyone’s campaign.

Two further claims are wrong against the named networks’ own pages. The post’s FAQ says “Bitmedia and A-Ads are known for having no minimum deposit requirement”. Bitmedia’s FAQ, read on 2 November, says “The min deposit for payments with card is 300$” and the same in crypto, waived only for bitcoin; A-ADS’s advertiser FAQ says “The minimum deposit is 100 USD, or higher depending on the selected coin and network”. Both are in our Bitmedia pricing guide and our A-ADS vs Coinzilla head-to-head. The post also calls Blockchain-Ads “the now industry-leading” Web3-native network and closes by telling readers to “Allocate a significant portion of your budget to networks like Blockchain-Ads”, a platform whose agreement requires $10,000 to open an account and whose Trustpilot profile stood at 2.2 from 43 reviews when we last read it, on 4 November 2026; our Blockchain-Ads vs Coinzilla head-to-head has that contract. A sales blog recommending a competitor with a bigger minimum than its own is unusual, and it is a reminder that the post is a 2023 argument for a category, not a current description of any network, including Slise.

Trustpilot, read properly

On 2 November 2026 Coinzilla stood at 3.0 out of 5 from 105 reviews on a profile it has claimed since August 2019: 90 five-star, 4 four-star, 11 one-star and nothing in between. Four reviews arrived in the last twelve months, two five-star and two one-star; the profile panel says Coinzilla has replied to 33% of negative reviews, and of the two recent one-stars the January one has a reply and the October one does not. The score fell from 3.5 to 3.0 on a single 18 October one-star, which is what Trustpilot’s recency weighting does to a profile that has stopped collecting, and that review is the useful one: a publisher describing a 5,000-visitors-a-month requirement that had to be proved with Google Analytics and a support chat unanswered for almost a week. The other recent one-stars are a rejected publisher in January 2026, a faucet owner told in June 2025 that faucets were not being accepted, a January 2025 complaint about repeated KYC before a payout, and the October 2024 advertiser refused a €450 refund. Every one of them traces to a policy that is written down somewhere on Coinzilla’s site, which is a different kind of complaint from a network that does not pay.

Slise has no Trustpilot page. The address trustpilot.com/review/slise.xyz returned the not-found screen on 2 November, as it did when we reviewed the network in September and when we compared it with HypeLab in October. We found no independent customer review on any platform, no publisher payment dispute and no public complaint. For a network that sells by agreement and invoice rather than through a public dashboard that silence is explicable, and it cuts both ways: nobody has accused Slise of anything, and nobody outside Slise has praised it either. Its evidence is its own case studies, QuickNode, COINSBEE and a Ledger-against-Trezor campaign with “50+ creatives tested”, and three homepage testimonials with names and titles attached. Treat them as a brief for your own measurement, not as a record.

Side by side

	Slise	Coinzilla
Company	Web3 Media Ventures Limited, Seychelles no. 239979, Hong Kong correspondence address; Hong Kong law, HKIAC arbitration	Sevio Digital Limited, company no. 729804, Dublin; Irish law and courts
Contract in force	Terms of Service effective 28 November 2025	Terms and Conditions version 1.1 of 10 July 2023
Where ads run	Inside dApps: DeFi protocols, explorers, NFT analytics, Web3 games; publisher list on request	Crypto and finance media: CoinGecko, Etherscan, DEXTools, DEX Screener, Blockchain.com, Solscan, BscScan and others; “1B+” impressions a month
How you start	Contact form, agreement, invoice; dashboard after onboarding (“Not authorized” to visitors)	Public sign-up, iDenfy identity check or company documents, deposit, campaign review
Minimum	$500 on the launch-offer FAQ; “minimum campaign budget: $5,000” in the terms	€100 in advance (terms); €50 a day per campaign (homepage)
Pricing	CPM only; “under $10” (launch offer), “$6-7” (case study); no service fee claimed	CPM bidding, no rate card; FAQ brackets €0.2 awareness to €3 premium; marketplace at fixed prices
Formats	728×90 and 270×90, JPG or GIF	300×250, 728×90, 160×600, 320×100, 300×600, 320×50, HTML5; native, header, sticky, pop-under
Targeting	Location, device, Web3 personas, chains, wallet activity, wallet lists	Website, ad zone, country, region, device; retargeting pixel
Payment in	Bank transfer, USDT, USDC, ETH, BTC	Bank transfer, card, crypto via SpectroCoin or CoinGate (USDT dropped February 2025); balance held in EUR, exchange fees deducted
Refunds	“final and non-refundable”; only if Slise terminates; 6-month inactivity forfeiture	Non-refundable in capitals; refund only if Coinzilla terminates for reasons not attributable to you; 1-year inactivity deletion with warnings
Liability cap	“five USD ($5.00)”	Fees paid for the relevant services
Publisher payout	USDT (ERC-20) only, within 15 days after month-end, threshold unstated	€50 threshold, weekly or monthly, 1–2 business days, BTC, ETH, USDC or wire; fees deducted
Publisher penalties	Restoration fee 10% of unpaid earnings or $1,000, 12-month non-circumvention, audit with Google Analytics data	Max 3 banners at once, unpublished traffic threshold, second review only after one week
Trustpilot, 2 Nov 2026	No profile	3.0/5 from 105; 11 one-star; 4 in 12 months; replied to 33% of negative reviews
Our score	5.5/10	9/10

Which door for which campaign

A first crypto campaign with a budget you could lose. Coinzilla, without hesitation: €100 in, a bid you set, a campaign live in a business day, and the worst case is the deposit under a contract that says so in capitals. Start there, measure, and keep Cointraffic and HypeLab for the second round.

A protocol, bridge, wallet or developer tool whose user already has a wallet connected. Slise, for a parallel test, at the smallest budget the account manager will put in writing, with the quoted minimum, the payout threshold if you also publish, and the geographies you will and will not accept all written into the agreement. Compare it with HypeLab, the other in-dApp network, whose contract starts at 100 USD and names a Delaware court.

A press release, a sponsored article or a newsletter slot alongside display. Coinzilla; Slise sells two banner sizes and nothing else, and Coinzilla’s marketplace funds everything from the same balance.

A publisher deciding where the first slot goes. Coinzilla if you run a crypto content site with a few thousand monthly visitors, because the floor, the schedule and the rails are published and the rejections are explained, eventually. Slise only if you run a dApp and have read sections 3, 7 and 8 of its terms with the person who will sign them.

The bottom line

Slise and Coinzilla agree on one thing, that your deposit belongs to the network the moment it lands, and disagree on everything that surrounds that sentence. Coinzilla publishes its floor, its daily minimum, its format list, its payout schedule and its exception, runs an identity check that regulated advertisers need, and backs it with an Irish company whose liability is the fees you paid. Slise publishes a $500 FAQ and a $5,000 contract, a two-line format list, a payout rail in one stablecoin and a five-dollar liability cap, behind a contact form. Slise’s argument for itself, that the wallet-connected user is worth more than the reader, is a good one, and its own blog makes it badly, with a targeting claim Coinzilla’s pages contradict and a minimum-deposit claim Bitmedia’s and A-ADS’s contradict. Both verdicts stand after today’s re-read: 9/10 for the network that tells you the terms before you ask, 5.5/10 for the one that makes you ask. Our full ranking places both.

Slise vs Coinzilla FAQ

Is Slise or Coinzilla better for crypto advertising?

For most advertisers Coinzilla: a €100 self-serve door, six banner sizes plus native and a marketplace, published payout terms and an Irish contract whose liability cap is the fees you paid. Slise is better for one job, reaching users with a wallet connected inside DeFi apps, explorers and Web3 games, and it sells that through a contact form under a contract with a $5,000 minimum and a $5 liability cap. Our scores are 9/10 and 5.5/10.

What is the minimum budget at Slise vs Coinzilla?

Coinzilla’s terms require €100 paid in advance and its homepage adds a €50 minimum daily budget per campaign. Slise’s launch-offer FAQ says $500, while its terms of service say “minimum campaign budget: $5,000”; the contract figure governs unless your agreement says otherwise, so get the quoted number in writing.

Do Slise and Coinzilla refund unused balances?

No. Coinzilla’s terms declare all amounts paid non-refundable in capitals, with one exception when Coinzilla terminates the agreement for reasons not attributable to you, and delete idle accounts with their balance after one year. Slise’s terms make every payment “final and non-refundable”, refundable only if Slise itself ends the service, and allow idle balances to be forfeited after six months.

Does Coinzilla offer targeting, as Slise’s blog says it does not?

Coinzilla targets by website, ad zone, country, region and device, and sells a retargeting pixel; what it does not offer is wallet-level targeting by on-chain activity, which Slise does. Slise’s blog post of July 2023 says Coinzilla provides no specific targeting and that 98% of a budget there is wasted; the first claim is contradicted by Coinzilla’s own pages and the second is a ratio of unrelated figures, not a measurement.

How do Slise and Coinzilla pay publishers?

Coinzilla pays from a €50 threshold, automatically weekly or monthly, processed in one to two business days, in BTC, ETH, USDC or by bank wire; USDT payouts ended in February 2025 under MiCA although the publisher page still lists it, and conversion and bank fees are deducted. Slise pays in USDT on Ethereum only, within 15 days after month-end, from a threshold its terms do not state, and charges suspended publishers a restoration fee of 10% of unpaid earnings or $1,000.

Does either network have reviews on Trustpilot?

Coinzilla does: 3.0 out of 5 from 105 reviews on 2 November 2026, 90 of them five-star and 11 one-star, with four reviews in the last twelve months, two of them one-star. Slise has no Trustpilot profile and we found no independent customer review of it anywhere.

Reviewed in full

• Coinzilla 9/10

  The default choice in crypto advertising — quietly displacing older rivals.

• Slise 5.5/10

  The most Web3-native targeting in the niche — behind a $5,000 door and a $5 liability cap.

• A-ADS 7/10

  The 2011 original — still anonymous, still cookie-less, still paying in BTC every day.

• Bitmedia 6.5/10

  The Web3 ad veteran with deep targeting — and a thinning footprint on premium crypto media.

• HypeLab 7/10

  Ads where the wallets already are — the most engineering-dense young network in the niche.

• Blockchain-Ads 4.5/10

  The biggest claims in crypto advertising — behind a $10,000 door and a 2.6-star record.

Sources

The figures above come from these pages, published by the companies themselves unless noted. "Checked" is the date we last read each page.

1. Slise Terms of Service, effective 28 November 2025: Web3 Media Ventures Limited (Seychelles no. 239979), clauses 3.2, 3.3, 4.2, 4.3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 13 ($5.00 liability cap), 17 (Hong Kong law, HKIAC) checked 2 Nov 2026
2. Slise launch offer and FAQ: $500 minimum starting budget, agreement + invoice route, CPM under $10, 728×90 and 270×90 JPG/GIF, CPM-only, top-10 geographies, payment methods, publisher list on request checked 2 Nov 2026
3. Slise homepage: Top 2% crypto-traffic claim, wallet-list targeting, MAADS note, three testimonials, three blog links checked 2 Nov 2026
4. Slise case studies: QuickNode 0.46% CTR / $1.30 CPC, COINSBEE 0.58% / $1.15 and ‘competitive CPM of $6-7’, Ledger vs Trezor ‘50+ creatives tested’ checked 2 Nov 2026
5. Slise privacy policy: ‘Slise Inc.’ named as data controller checked 2 Nov 2026
6. Slise contact page (the only route in; every button reads ‘Contact us’) checked 2 Nov 2026
7. Slise dashboard as seen by a visitor: ‘Not authorized’ checked 2 Nov 2026
8. Slise /publishers: not-found page checked 2 Nov 2026
9. Slise /advertisers: not-found page checked 2 Nov 2026
10. Slise /pricing: not-found page checked 2 Nov 2026
11. Slise /about: not-found page checked 2 Nov 2026
12. Slise blog, ‘The Red Pill for Crypto Marketers: 5 Hard Truths About User Acquisition Beyond Coinzilla’, Oleksii Sidorov, 10 July 2023 (text mentions 2025): targeting, 98% waste, Bitmedia/A-Ads no-minimum and Blockchain-Ads claims checked 2 Nov 2026
13. Slise blog index (Substack) checked 2 Nov 2026
14. MAADS homepage: Slise and AADS listed as the agency’s growth tools checked 2 Nov 2026
15. Coinzilla Terms and Conditions, version 1.1 of 10 July 2023: Sevio Digital Limited (no. 729804, Dublin), EUR 100 minimum, iDenfy KYC, non-refundable clause, refund on termination not attributable to the User, 1-year inactivity deletion, notional-value balances, liability cap, 24/72-hour moderation, excluded countries, 15 days’ notice, Irish law, 3-banner rule, second review after one week, publisher payout 1-2 business days, conversion costs checked 3 Nov 2026
16. Coinzilla homepage: 1B+ impressions, 1.8M+ clicks, 50,000+ campaigns, ‘over 80%’ claim, FAQ ‘EUR 100 … minimum daily budget of EUR 50 per campaign’ checked 2 Nov 2026
17. Coinzilla advertiser FAQ: country/device targeting, €0.2 to €3 CPM brackets, approval within 1 business day (48 hours at weekends) checked 3 Nov 2026
18. Coinzilla publisher FAQ: cryptocurrency-related websites, €50 payout threshold checked 3 Nov 2026
19. Coinzilla general FAQ checked 2 Nov 2026
20. Coinzilla ad formats: six banner sizes, HTML5, native, header, sticky, pop-under; CTR figures 0.15%, 0.20–0.40%, 0.20–0.30% checked 2 Nov 2026
21. Coinzilla publishers page: site list (CoinGecko, Etherscan, DEXTools, DEX Screener, Blockchain.com, Solscan, BscScan, BeInCrypto, CryptoPotato…), weekly/monthly payments, ‘no costs via BTC, ETH, USDT (ERC20), or Bank Wire’ checked 3 Nov 2026
22. Coinzilla Web3 advertising page: website, ad zone, country, region, device targeting checked 2 Nov 2026
23. Coinzilla retargeting page: ‘up to 70%’ conversion claim checked 2 Nov 2026
24. Coinzilla marketplace: press releases, sponsored articles, newsletter placements checked 2 Nov 2026
25. Coinzilla marketplace packages checked 2 Nov 2026
26. Coinzilla advertisers page checked 3 Nov 2026
27. Coinzilla about page checked 2 Nov 2026
28. Coinzilla contact page checked 2 Nov 2026
29. Coinzilla prediction-markets page checked 2 Nov 2026
30. Coinzilla blog, 26 February 2025: USDT payouts ended under MiCA, switch to USDC or bank checked 2 Nov 2026
31. Coinzilla blog, 2025: card deposits available checked 2 Nov 2026
32. Coinzilla blog: automatic weekly (Monday) or monthly (1st) publisher payouts since 1 May 2022 checked 2 Nov 2026
33. Coinzilla blog, first-campaign guide: ‘a greater chance of winning the bid’ checked 2 Nov 2026
34. Coinzilla blog: CoinMarketCap app placement checked 2 Nov 2026
35. Trustpilot, Coinzilla: 3.0/5 from 105 reviews (90 five-star, 4 four-star, 11 one-star), profile claimed 30 August 2019, 4 reviews in the last 12 months, ‘Replied to 33% of negative reviews’ (unchanged 3 Nov 2026); reviews of 18 Oct 2026, 19 Jan 2026, 14 Jun 2025, 22 Jan 2025, 7 Oct 2024 and Coinzilla’s replies checked 3 Nov 2026
36. Trustpilot, Slise: no profile (not-found page) checked 2 Nov 2026
37. Bitmedia FAQ: ‘The min deposit for payments with card is 300$’, bitcoin exempt checked 3 Nov 2026
38. A-ADS advertiser FAQ: ‘The minimum deposit is 100 USD, or higher depending on the selected coin and network’ checked 2 Nov 2026
39. A-ADS advertise page checked 3 Nov 2026

Get an email when a network changes its prices or terms

Minimum deposits, payout thresholds, fees and refund rules move without notice. We re-check them at the source and email you only when something you follow changes. No newsletter, no promotions, one-click unsubscribe.

Email address

Website

Notify me

Double opt-in. We store only your address and what you follow; see the privacy policy.